L1 is dead, Appchain should rise

By: rootdata|2026/04/20 12:12:49
0
Share
copy

Author: iwillpat

Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher

Since the era of "Rollup as a Service" (RaaS) began, the outcome has already been determined. This is a precursor to the execution layer falling into a death spiral and commoditization.

What I mean is that general-purpose L1 tokens will continue to trend towards zero, and possibly without exception. I will try to explain the reasons, and how I would pivot if I were an L1 operator.

The main drivers of L1 failure are as follows: linear token release, failed value propositions, poor management, and the industry's "leadership."

I will briefly elaborate on these points—these are just personal opinions, not conclusions.

The current form of linear staking release has some benefits, namely distribution through liquid staking ("My 7% annualized!"), but it has failed in several key areas.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) makes it easy for the "decentralization purists" who talk a big game to participate in network security, but it does not properly incentivize insiders, users, and developers. At best, it only incentivizes people to hold tokens, which does nothing to create any actual value.

I have heard the classic argument about PoS: large validators have economic incentives not to dump on you. But that hasn't stopped them from selling every possible unlock amount and block reward.

This leads to my next point: they sell because L1 tokens have no long-term value proposition.

A "Tissue" That Breaks with a Poke

The arguments about "Gas tokens" and "governance" are old and unconvincing—like two Bounty tissues that fall apart with a single poke. The value of network tokens depends on what you can buy with them.

Therefore, the goal of all blockchain teams should be to promote their tokens as widely as possible for circulation as currency. In the pursuit of higher TPS and lower block times, the industry's vision of "peer-to-peer electronic cash" seems to have been lost.

To put it bluntly: throughput, TVL, and low latency do not give tokens any value. Liquidity and usage do.

The next point is the most practical and painful: blockchain "labs." (And various foundations.)

Dumping tokens after the lock-up period, off-market trades at huge discounts, jaw-dropping operational expenses, incentive programs to attract hot money, hiring "KOLs"... we can all name a few.

Ultimately, every penny spent by Labs is a tax levied on token holders. Unless the Labs generate revenue through some service, first-party wallet, or application, they are surviving by selling tokens.

This is not necessarily a bad thing—they provide valuable services through engineering resources, browsers, and APIs. But if Labs do not bring net new buying pressure to the tokens, and spending continues to rise unsustainably, they will slowly bleed to death.

One of the primary goals

You may also like

Morning News | CME Group launches Nasdaq Cryptocurrency Index futures; Asset management giant Janus Henderson strategically invests in Ethena

Overview of Important Market Events on June 10

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?

The Bitcoin L2 star project Botanix announced a gradual shutdown, with the team admitting to facing severe challenges from the failure of its business model and the prevailing trends. Users are urged to withdraw all assets before July 9, 2026.

Why did Oracle deliver the strongest financial report in history, yet its stock price fell?

Oracle's revenue for fiscal year 2026 set a record, with AI cloud orders soaring to $638 billion, but massive capital expenditures on computing power led to negative free cash flow, causing a 5% drop in after-hours stock prices.

When the P2P illicit funds from ten years ago turned into 60,000 bitcoins

The largest Bitcoin money laundering case in the UK has new developments: 16,000 Chinese victims are pursuing 61,000 seized Bitcoins across borders, and the dispute over the applicability of UK and Chinese laws will directly determine whether the victims can share in the soaring profits.

Dialogue with OmenX Founder: Why does the prediction market need an evolution from "spot" to "derivatives"?

How to reconstruct the prediction market using leverage?

Galaxy in-depth report: Is Solana still worth paying attention to?

Solana did not fall behind during the bear market. Trading enthusiasm has waned, but the network is more stable, RWA and stablecoins are expanding, and the capital foundation is much thicker than in the previous cycle. The real question is: when the speculative tide recedes, can perpetuals, predicti...

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com