Is the Aave-to-Solana move worth debating?
Yesterday, Virtuals Protocol announced that the VIRTUAL token is now tradable on the Solana blockchain, with its official LP now live on Meteora and preparations underway for Virtual Protocol's Launchpad on Solana. Meanwhile, Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik tweeted about when Aave would be available on Solana, mentioning Aave team members and Solana's founder.
However, the replies to this tweet turned into a debate between Solana supporters and Aave fans, reflecting a broader market share battle between the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems in specific application areas.
A "War of Words" on Lending Protocols
Solana bull and Multicoin partner Kyle Samani commented under this tweet mentioning Kamino, a DeFi lending protocol in the Solana ecosystem, suggesting that Kamino is Solana's version of Aave.
Svanevik responded, stating that Aave is ten times larger than Kamino and that "if Aave users could seamlessly switch chains, it would unleash a significant TVL."
However, Solana's founder toly and Foundation Chair Lily Liu disagree. Lily mentioned that Kamino's product is superior, proudly stating, "Today's metrics don't represent tomorrow's performance." toly supported a native team focused on the Solana mainnet, suggesting that backing a team that concentrates on Solana long-term is wiser than supporting a multi-chain team with divided attention, effectively dismissing the possibility of Aave on Solana.
Amidst the sharp criticisms from the Solana community, supporters of Aave and the Ethereum ecosystem were not to be outdone.
Aave founder Stani directly criticized Solana DeFi, stating that it copied Aave's outdated technology, pasted a semi-finished UI, and restricted UK users. While Stani referred to Solana DeFi, it was clear to observers that he was targeting Kamino, another lending protocol.
Subsequently, toly shared the DeFiLlama interface of Aave and Kamino, stating that Kamino's TVL is 1/8 of Aave's, but its revenue is only 1/2.5 of Aave's. "I don't understand why Aave would be a better product if no revenue can be squeezed out of it; TVL is just a cost."
Stani also sharply replied that Kamino's USDC reserve factor (i.e., the percentage the platform extracts from each transaction or pool) is 15%, while Aave's is only 10%, meaning it charges higher fees extracted from user pools. Stani believes this shows the current lack of competitiveness in the Solana ecosystem, resulting in weak bargaining power for users when choosing a DeFi platform, leading to higher fees that are ultimately borne by users.
The instigator of this "war of words," Alex Svanevik, then added fuel to the fire, suggesting that Solana has surpassed Ethereum in several key metrics, including active addresses, transaction volume, DEX trading volume, and total gas fee revenue. However, in terms of TVL, Solana has yet to surpass Ethereum. In light of this, the most direct strategy is to attract Aave, the top-ranked app by TVL on Ethereum, to deploy on Solana, further enhancing its competitiveness in the DeFi ecosystem.
Some in the comments section questioned the rationale behind this, as deploying Aave on Solana would not magically create TVL. Svanevik explained that for Aave's deployment to have absolutely no impact on Solana's TVL growth, two conditions must be met simultaneously:
1. Aave's current TVL has no funds migrating to Solana;
2. There is no additional TVL entering Aave on Solana.
However, as Aave has already attracted $200 billion in TVL, Svanevik believes Aave should migrate to Solana, leaving people momentarily unable to determine whether Svanevik is an Ethereum maxi or a Solana maxi.
Trust Cost Above All
Undoubtedly, Aave is a core DeFi application in the Ethereum ecosystem, alongside Uniswap, Lido, and others, forming the core landscape of Ethereum DeFi. However, some in the community question why Ethereum's top DeFi applications would overlook an ecosystem like Solana with unlimited potential. Putting aside code and other technical factors, the reasons why an application chooses not to migrate to a new ecosystem are the same as those that choose to expand their ecosystem—to achieve incremental growth.
The Virtuals Protocol has expanded to Solana, gaining a broader user base and liquidity pool. The fact that Aave has not moved to Solana likely also involves considerations about the competitive landscape. Solana's current DeFi sector has become more mature, with multiple post-team projects competing in the lending protocol space, such as Kamino, marginfi, and Save. Therefore, the cost of Aave's expansion would be higher than anticipated.
More importantly, Aave's existing brand image will also face uncertainties due to the expansion. As some in the community have expressed, "If a fund in the seven to eight-digit range wishes to earn above-chain returns while ensuring security, nine out of ten times, they would recommend going to Aave on Ethereum rather than DeFi on Solana, Tron, Celestia, or any other chain."
Security is the foundation of a lending product. Only when there is an adequate security audit, experience in handling hack attempts, and a mature contract design will both large fund holders and regular users choose to park their assets there. Therefore, Aave's ability to become one of the most influential lending platforms on Ethereum is inseparable from Ethereum's long-standing developer ecosystem, security audit cases, and a huge, mature liquidity pool.
The financial nature of DeFi determines that "the longer it runs, the stickier it becomes." This stickiness is rooted in a deep trust in the security and stability of the product's smart contract. This "trust cost" extends beyond considerations of the speed, performance, and transaction fees of a new chain and includes the completeness of the infrastructure, the coverage of auditing companies, the community's alertness to potential security vulnerabilities, and the ecosystem's responsiveness to timely remedies under extreme conditions.
Further reading: "Rethinking DeFi: The Present and Future of Web3 Business Models"
Reflecting on Ethereum DeFi's development over the past few years, many projects have experienced significant vulnerabilities or security incidents, even suffering losses of hundreds of millions of dollars. It is through each response and iteration that the security rampart of Ethereum DeFi has gradually been built. Aave's popularity stems from leveraging this security moat, making it the preferred choice for high-volume users, especially institutional players. In other words, most people see Aave as synonymous with "low risk, decent returns," particularly for users with multi-million or even multi-tens-of-millions of dollars, where security and stability always come before incremental gains.
In contrast, Solana, as a high-performance Layer1 blockchain, does have certain advantages in transaction speed, gas fees, and other aspects. However, from the perspective of a lending protocol, the core of financial applications lies in the "risk-reward ratio." While speed and low fees are important, if a platform cannot provide sufficiently proven security and a tamper-resistant record, such advantages often may not be enough to support a long-term migration of significant liquidity in the DeFi space. Especially in lending businesses, they have to deal with multiple risk factors such as liquidation, interest rate fluctuations, smart contract audits, and hacking attacks; once issues arise, the platform's years of accumulated brand image and trust will be instantly shattered, and this "trust cost" is far more expensive than the technology itself.
Furthermore, even if Aave does choose to expand to Solana, it does not necessarily guarantee a "skyrocketing" Total Value Locked (TVL). Funds are profit-driven and rational; the two to three hundred billion dollars TVL accumulated by Aave on the Ethereum mainnet is not automatically willing to migrate to another chain. On the contrary, due to significant differences in underlying technology stacks, programming languages, and even community cultures among different chains, Aave needs to invest a significant amount of time and resources to adapt and audit, implying extremely high expansion costs and management risks. Moreover, the existing native lending protocols on Solana are also maturing, and Aave does not possess an insurmountable first-mover advantage.
Therefore, with the premise of having a triple moat of security barriers, brand, and fund scale, if Aave insists on expanding massively to Solana, it may not be the wisest choice. After all, in the long marathon race of DeFi, winning users' trust and security awareness is the most unshakable core barrier.
You may also like
SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?
OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.
Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI
Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention
Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.
Humanity Protocol Security Incident Escalates: More Than $31 Million Stolen From Related Addresses as Attacker Continues Selling H for ETH
On June 9, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, more than $31 million has been stolen from addresses linked to Humanity Protocol, and the attack is still ongoing, with the hacker continuously swapping H tokens for ETH. Project founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident on X, saying the issue involved a private key leak.
Bloomberg: As Bitcoin Weakens, Stablecoins and RWA Continue to Drive Expansion in Crypto Businesses
In June, Bloomberg reported that despite Bitcoin falling below $60,000 last week, wiping out about $235 billion in market value within seven days, and dropping close to 50% from last year’s peak, some core businesses in the crypto industry are still expanding, mainly in stablecoins, real-world asset tokenization (RWA), payments, and infrastructure. The report also noted that overall altcoin activity has contracted significantly: altcoin market capitalization has fallen from a peak of about $431 billion in November 2021 to around $170 billion, and among the tens of millions of tokens issued in recent years, fewer than 1,700 still maintain meaningful trading activity.
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.
Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.
Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?
OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.
Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI
Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention
Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.
Humanity Protocol Security Incident Escalates: More Than $31 Million Stolen From Related Addresses as Attacker Continues Selling H for ETH
On June 9, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, more than $31 million has been stolen from addresses linked to Humanity Protocol, and the attack is still ongoing, with the hacker continuously swapping H tokens for ETH. Project founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident on X, saying the issue involved a private key leak.
