How to Evaluate a Curator?
Original Article Title: Curators Explained
Original Author: @MerlinEgalite
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: As DeFi shifts from a high-yield-driven model to institutional and infrastructure competition, Morpho is attempting to reshape on-chain lending organization through its Vault and Curator mechanism. This article, from a platform perspective, introduces the role and non-custodial, programmatic operational logic of the Curator.
The following is the original article:
What Is a Curator?
A Curator is an independent team or entity, not part of the official Morpho team, responsible for designing, deploying, and managing on-chain Vaults.
At a high level, the Curator's job is to: package a diversified investment portfolio into user-friendly, easy-to-integrate Vault products.
Specific to Morpho Vaults, these Vaults are essentially investment portfolios made up of a set of overcollateralized lending positions. This structure enables users to: deposit in one place; earn yield with one click; and delegate ongoing risk management and portfolio construction work to the Curator.
In traditional finance, the role closest to a Vault Curator is an asset manager or fund manager. Both are responsible for strategy formulation and risk management, but there are significant differences in fundamental structure: the Vault Curator is non-custodial, with execution entirely automated through smart contracts, transparent throughout, and does not rely on human intermediaries.
In Morpho Vaults, a Curator can never take custody of or manage user funds. What they do is execute established strategies through programmatically configuring the Vault.
Users can freely deposit or withdraw funds at any time without needing anyone's approval, and there is no possibility of being artificially prevented; ownership and control of the assets always remain in the users' hands.
Curator's Business Model
A Curator can earn rewards through the following means: management fee; performance fee
The specific fee structure is determined by the Curator and can be configured for different Vaults, but must comply with the preset maximum fee rate.
Some Curators choose a lower fee rate; others rely on their own historical performance or differentiated strategies to charge higher fees. These decisions are entirely up to the Curator and are independent of Morpho.
In addition, Curators can also collaborate with distributors (such as fintech companies or platforms) to allocate fees generated by certain specific deposits between the Curator and the distributor through revenue sharing.
While the Curator's business model formally resembles a traditional asset manager, there is a key difference: the operating costs of the Vault are much lower than those of traditional funds or asset management platforms.
The Vault replaces the massive backend systems of traditional asset management with a few hundred lines of free, open-source code. The vast majority of processes are automated, everything runs in real-time on-chain, eliminating the need to wait for quarterly reports.
Therefore, Curators can often charge lower fees than traditional financial counterparts while maintaining a decent profit margin.
How to Evaluate a Curator (non-exhaustive list)
For corporate institutions, evaluating a Curator should not be unfamiliar. It is similar to evaluating traditional asset managers but with a significant advantage: full transparency.
The Vault is built on a public blockchain, and with various dashboard tools, you can instantly view detailed data on any Curator or Vault.
Here are some key evaluation dimensions:
Track Record
What are the work experiences in the DeFi field (and in related situations in the traditional financial field)?
Have collaborations been made with well-known enterprises, fintech companies, or institutions?
How has its strategy performed in different market cycles, especially in stress test phases?
What is the current total scale of funds managed in all Vaults?
While fund size itself cannot guarantee quality, it is often a useful signal of market trust and product fit.
Transparency & Methodology
Has the asset allocation method and risk control standards been clearly articulated?
Has an internal risk rating system been established?
Has the response process in market tightening or extreme events been disclosed?
How are the roles and permissions of each Vault delineated?
Is strict Operational Security (OpSec) practiced?
Is any form of insurance or risk mitigation mechanism provided?
Communications
Prior to depositing funds, attention should be paid to the Curator's public channels, such as X (Twitter) and the official website.
Is proactive communication maintained during high-yield periods and market turbulence?
Are regular updates provided on the Vault's performance, asset allocation changes, and risk events?
Conflicts of Interest
Have real or potential conflicts of interest been clearly disclosed?
Are there financial or governance relationships with certain protocols, investors, or counterparties that could influence allocation decisions?
Similar to traditional finance, responsible institutions should clearly explain the sources of conflicts and how they are managed.
Through the assessment of the above dimensions, institutions can choose a Curator that aligns with their needs in terms of strategy style, risk preference, and disclosure standards, while relying on the strong and tamper-proof systemic security provided by Morpho's underlying infrastructure.
Note: The above list is not exhaustive. Some content is relevant to Morpho Vaults and their Curators but may not necessarily apply to other platforms or Vault systems.
You may also like

February 10th Key Market Information Gap, A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

About ERC-8004: Everything You Need to Know

ai.com's Debut Flop: After $70 Million Transaction, Did It Get a '504' Timeout?

FedNow versus The Clearing House: Who Will Win the Fed Payments Fray?

Recovering $70,000 in Lost Funds: The "Fragile Logic" Behind Bitcoin's Rebound

Mr. Beast acquires Step, Farcaster Founder Joins Tempo, what are the international crypto circles talking about today?

February 9th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

After being questioned by Vitalik, L2s are collectively saying goodbye to the "cheap" era
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Paris Workshop Reveals: How Retail Crypto Traders Can Outperform Hedge Funds
Witness how WEEX's Paris AI Trading Hackathon revealed AI's edge over human traders. Explore key strategies, live competition results & how to build your own AI trading bot.

U.S. Oil (USOR) Price Prediction 2026–2030
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil (USOR) is a speculative Solana-based crypto project that aims to index the United States…

USOR Surges on Meme Narrative Despite No Real-World Asset Backing
Key Takeaways: USOR, a Solana-based token, has seen a notable surge driven by speculative narratives rather than verifiable…

How to Buy U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) Cryptocurrency
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) is a Solana-based token primarily traded on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). Claims have…

USOR vs Oil ETFs: Understanding Why the ‘Oil Reserve’ Token Doesn’t Track Crude Prices
Key Takeaways The U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) token has become noteworthy for its claims, yet it does not…

Trend Research Reduces Ether Holdings After Major Market Turbulence
Key Takeaways: Trend Research has significantly cut down its Ether holdings, moving over 404,000 ETH to exchanges recently.…

Investors Channel $258M into Crypto Startups Despite $2 Trillion Market Sell-Off
Key Takeaways: Investors pumped approximately $258 million into crypto startups in early February, highlighting continued support for blockchain-related…

NBA Star Giannis Antetokounmpo Becomes Shareholder in Prediction Market Kalshi
Key Takeaways: Giannis Antetokounmpo, the NBA’s two-time MVP, invests in the prediction market platform Kalshi as a shareholder.…

Arizona Home Invasion Targets $66 Million in Cryptocurrency: Two Teens Charged
Key Takeaways Two teenagers from California face serious felony charges for allegedly attempting to steal $66 million in…

El Salvador’s Bukele Approval Reaches Record 91.9% Despite Limited Bitcoin Use
Key Takeaways: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele enjoys a record high approval rating of 91.9% from his populace,…